AI coding assistants, compared on data — and one shared benchmark

Eight AI coding assistants, profiled from their vendors' own pricing pages: what the free tier really includes, what the paid tiers cost, and which form each tool takes. On top of that data layer we are running every free-tier tool through the same frozen benchmark repo, scored by unit tests — and until a run is complete, its pages say so. No invented scores, no borrowed screenshots.

See all eight compared How we test

The eight tools

Head-to-head comparisons

All comparisons →

Why this site exists: 2026 broke every comparison you have read

This category repriced and renamed itself in a single year. GitHub Copilot moved to credit-based metering in June 2026. Windsurf became Devin Desktop the same month. Cursor closed its old Pro tiers to new users in October 2026 and replaced them with a new line-up. Amazon Q Developer was succeeded by Kiro. Any comparison written before those changes — which is most of them — is now citing retired prices, old names, or both.

So this site treats pricing data as perishable: every profile names its source and the date it was read, and the data layer is re-checked monthly. When a vendor changes a plan, the profile changes — and the read date moves with it.

How a comparison gets made here

Three layers. First, the data layer: pricing, free-tier terms and platform facts from official vendor pages. Second, the hands-on layer: one frozen benchmark repo, the same six tasks for every tool, default settings, free tier, scored by unit tests, with our own screenshots. Third, the verdict layer: a written conclusion for each pairing that cites the first two layers — and says plainly which layer it is standing on. The full method is on the How We Test page.

Current status: profiles and data comparisons are live; hands-on runs for the six free-tier tools are scheduled, and Claude Code and Tabnine are data-only because neither offers a standing free tier.